TSTP Solution File: SEV229^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SEV229^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 09:41:50 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.40s
% Output   : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   21
%            Number of leaves      :   19
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  108 (   9 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  760 ( 168 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  795 (  68   ~; 167   |;  49   &; 383   @)
%                                         (   9 <=>;  81  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   17 (  17   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   20 (  16 usr;  15 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (  38  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   96 (  59   ^  36   !;   0   ?;  96   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    cE: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    cD: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    ph1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    sK3: a ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    sK4: a ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    sK5: a ).

thf(f169,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f58,f64,f81,f86,f91,f92,f97,f98,f99,f100,f114,f140,f154,f168]) ).

thf(f168,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f167]) ).

thf(f167,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f166]) ).

thf(f166,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f159,f68]) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ( ( ( cD @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f66]) ).

thf(f66,plain,
    ( spl0_3
  <=> ( ( cD @ sK3 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).

thf(f159,plain,
    ( ( ( cD @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f157]) ).

thf(f157,plain,
    ( ( ( cD @ sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f61,f85]) ).

thf(f85,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f83]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ( spl0_7
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_7])]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
          = $false )
        | ( ( cD @ X1 )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f60]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( ( cD @ X1 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
          = $false ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).

thf(f154,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f153]) ).

thf(f153,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f152]) ).

thf(f152,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f145,f72]) ).

thf(f72,plain,
    ( ( ( cE @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f70]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ( spl0_4
  <=> ( ( cE @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).

thf(f145,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cE @ sK5 ) )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f142]) ).

thf(f142,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cE @ sK5 ) )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f96,f57]) ).

thf(f57,plain,
    ( ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
          = $false )
        | ( ( cE @ X1 )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f56]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> ! [X1: a] :
        ( ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
          = $false )
        | ( ( cE @ X1 )
          = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).

thf(f96,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ~ spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f94]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( spl0_9
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_9])]) ).

thf(f140,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f139]) ).

thf(f139,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f138]) ).

thf(f138,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f132,f80]) ).

thf(f80,plain,
    ( ( ( cD @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f78]) ).

thf(f78,plain,
    ( spl0_6
  <=> ( ( cD @ sK4 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_6])]) ).

thf(f132,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cD @ sK4 ) )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f127]) ).

thf(f127,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( cD @ sK4 ) )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f90,f61]) ).

thf(f90,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK4 ) )
    | ~ spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f88]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( spl0_8
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_8])]) ).

thf(f114,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f113]) ).

thf(f113,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f112]) ).

thf(f112,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_5
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f107,f76]) ).

thf(f76,plain,
    ( ( ( cE @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f74]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( spl0_5
  <=> ( ( cE @ sK3 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])]) ).

thf(f107,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cE @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f104]) ).

thf(f104,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( cE @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f57,f85]) ).

thf(f100,plain,
    ( spl0_7
    | spl0_9
    | spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f24,f88,f94,f83]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK4 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
       => ( cD @ sK4 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
       => ( ( cD @ sK3 )
          & ( cE @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
       => ( cD @ sK4 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK5 )
       => ( cE @ sK5 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
       => ( cD @ sK4 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
       => ( ( cD @ sK3 )
          & ( cE @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
       => ( ( cD @ sK3 )
          & ( cE @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
       => ( cD @ sK4 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( cE @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK5 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
       => ( cD @ sK4 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
       => ( ( cD @ sK3 )
          & ( cE @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
       => ( ( cD @ sK3 )
          & ( cE @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( cD @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( cD @ Y0 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
       => ( ( cD @ sK3 )
          & ( cE @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( ( ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( cD @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
       => ( ( cD @ sK3 )
          & ( cE @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ( ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( cD @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
              & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK3 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
              & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( cD @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( !! @ a
      @ ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
         => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
            & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) )
   != ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( cD @ Y0 ) ) )
      & ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y1 )
                & ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) )
      @ sK2 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cD @ Y1 ) ) )
          & ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) )
      @ sK2 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cD @ Y1 ) ) )
          & ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y1 )
                & ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cD @ Y1 ) ) )
          & ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y1 )
                & ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cD @ Y1 ) ) )
          & ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
               => ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a > $o] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( Y0 @ Y1 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y1 )
                & ( cE @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: a > $o] :
          ( ! [X1: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X1 )
             => ( cE @ X1 ) )
          & ! [X2: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
             => ( cD @ X2 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [X3: a > $o] :
        ! [X4: a] :
          ( ( X3 @ X4 )
         => ( ( cE @ X4 )
            & ( cD @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X1: a > $o] :
          ( ! [X2: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             => ( cE @ X2 ) )
          & ! [X2: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             => ( cD @ X2 ) ) ) )
   != ( ^ [X0: a > $o] :
        ! [X1: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 )
         => ( ( cE @ X1 )
            & ( cD @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ^ [X1: a > $o] :
          ( ! [X2: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             => ( cE @ X2 ) )
          & ! [X2: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             => ( cD @ X2 ) ) ) )
    = ( ^ [X0: a > $o] :
        ! [X1: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X1 )
         => ( ( cE @ X1 )
            & ( cD @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wuQxNy0be2/Vampire---4.8_26665',cX5209_pme) ).

thf(f99,plain,
    ( spl0_6
    | spl0_7
    | spl0_9 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f23,f94,f83,f78]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( cD @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f98,plain,
    ( spl0_8
    | spl0_9
    | spl0_3
    | spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f27,f74,f66,f94,f88]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( cE @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( cD @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( ( cE @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
       => ( cD @ sK4 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( cD @ sK3 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( cD @ sK3 )
        & ( cE @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
       => ( cD @ sK4 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f97,plain,
    ( spl0_5
    | spl0_6
    | spl0_9
    | spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f26,f66,f94,f78,f74]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( ( cD @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( cE @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK5 ) )
    | ( ( cD @ sK4 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f92,plain,
    ( spl0_4
    | spl0_7
    | spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f31,f88,f83,f70]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK4 ) )
    | ( ( cE @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK4 ) )
    | ( ( cE @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
       => ( ( cD @ sK3 )
          & ( cE @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( ( cE @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK4 )
       => ( cD @ sK4 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
       => ( ( cD @ sK3 )
          & ( cE @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f91,plain,
    ( spl0_5
    | spl0_4
    | spl0_3
    | spl0_8 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f32,f88,f66,f70,f74]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( ( ( cE @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( cD @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( cE @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK4 ) )
    | ( ( cE @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( cD @ sK3 )
        & ( cE @ sK3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f86,plain,
    ( spl0_6
    | spl0_7
    | spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f34,f70,f83,f78]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( ( cE @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( cD @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( ( cD @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( cE @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
       => ( ( cD @ sK3 )
          & ( cE @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    ( spl0_3
    | spl0_4
    | spl0_5
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f35,f78,f74,f70,f66]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ( ( cE @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( cE @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( cD @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( cD @ sK4 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( ( cE @ sK5 )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( cD @ sK3 )
        & ( cE @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( ( cD @ sK4 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f64,plain,
    ( spl0_2
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f45,f60,f60]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( ( sK2 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( cD @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( cD @ X2 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f43]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( cD @ X2 )
          & ( cE @ X2 ) ) )
      | ( ( sK2 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( cD @ X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f42]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( sK2 @ X2 )
         => ( ( cD @ X2 )
            & ( cE @ X2 ) ) ) )
      | ( ( cD @ X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
                & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
          @ X2 ) )
      | ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( cD @ X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f40]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
                & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( cD @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
         => ( cD @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
                & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( cD @ Y0 ) )
          @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
                & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f37]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( cD @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
              & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( cD @ Y0 ) ) )
        & ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
    | ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
              & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f54,f56,f56]) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( cE @ X2 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( sK2 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( cE @ X1 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f51]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( ( cE @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( sK2 @ X2 )
         => ( cE @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f50]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ( cD @ X1 )
          & ( cE @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( sK2 @ X2 )
         => ( cE @ X2 ) ) )
      | ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f49]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
         => ( ( cD @ X1 )
            & ( cE @ X1 ) ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( sK2 @ X2 )
         => ( cE @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f48]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( cE @ Y0 ) )
          @ X2 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
         => ( ( cD @ X1 )
            & ( cE @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f47]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ( sK2 @ X1 )
         => ( ( cD @ X1 )
            & ( cE @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f46]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
                & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) )
          @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
             => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( ( cD @ Y0 )
              & ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
           => ( cE @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : SEV229^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 12:16:23 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.37  This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.16/0.37  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wuQxNy0be2/Vampire---4.8_26665
% 0.16/0.39  % (26917)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26920)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26919)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26915)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26916)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26921)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26918)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26922)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26918)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.39  % (26918)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  % (26918)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26918)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.39  % (26918)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.16/0.39  % (26919)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.39  % (26919)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  % (26919)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26919)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.39  % (26919)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  % (26919)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.16/0.39  % (26919)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.39  % (26919)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26919)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  % (26919)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  % (26918)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.16/0.39  % (26918)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.39  % (26918)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26918)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  % (26918)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  % (26922)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.16/0.39  % (26922)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  % (26922)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26922)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  % (26922)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.39  % (26922)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.39  % (26922)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26922)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  % (26922)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  % (26916)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.39  % (26916)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  % (26916)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26916)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.39  % (26916)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.16/0.39  
% 0.16/0.39  % (26916)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.39  % (26916)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.39  % (26916)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.16/0.39  % (26916)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  % (26916)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.39  % (26920)First to succeed.
% 0.16/0.40  % (26921)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.16/0.40  % (26920)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.16/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.16/0.40  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.40  % (26920)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.40  % (26920)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.40  % (26920)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.16/0.40  
% 0.16/0.40  % (26920)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.40  % (26920)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.16/0.40  % (26920)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.16/0.40  % (26920)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.40  % (26920)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.40  % (26914)Success in time 0.022 s
% 0.16/0.40  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------